[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Draft schemas from the meeting
Karen,
I agree with you on the need for the committee to address
CIQ content item specifically. And yes, I was just looking for a "straw
man" CIQ profile. But, "Party" and
"Address" fill that need for now. Are there others that the committee wants?
Should be a primary question for Thursday.
The difference between CIQInformation and Location was that
Location is (at least in my mind) the container for the GML structure and
CIQ is the structure for addressing, party naming, etc. following the OASIS
spec for such data. So, in my mind, CIQ was not part of Location, nor was
Location part of CIQInformation. Rather both were potential parts of
ContactInformationType along with Radio, and a generic
Description. The objective was to put a place in for
both standards, without having to directly mix them. It was
just my personal interpretation. I am not hard over on it, though. If
there is reason to do differently, I think the committee would be open to it. I
certainly am.
Can I take it from your comments that the rest of the
schema layout is OK with you? After the "types" schema concept
was your idea, and a good one. Keep the input rolling!!!!
Thanks,
R/s
Gary A. Ham Senior Research Scientist Battelle Memorial Institute 540-288-5611 (office) 703-869-6241
(cell) "You would be surprised what you can accomplish
when you do not care who gets the credit." - Harry S.
Truman From: Karen Robinson [mailto:Karen.Robinson@nicta.com.au] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:13 PM To: Ham, Gary A Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Draft schemas from the meeting Hi
Gary, Thanks for sending the
schemas. I’m a bit confused about what you want me to do with the CIQ
information. It looks like the “CIQInformationType” type I added is still
there, just commented out. Could we just uncomment it for now and use it
“as is” until we develop a CIQ profile consisting of an appropriately restricted
subset of CIQ? Or are you asking me to actually develop the CIQ
profile? Unfortunately, I doubt that I could work out all of the potential
parts of CIQ we might need by myself – I think this is probably an activity for
the group as a whole to tackle. So far, I have identified “Party” and
“Address” as potentially useful parts of CIQ, but there must be other elements
as well. One thing that confuses
me about the latest ERM and schema is why CIQInformation has been taken out of
LocationType. Previously, CIQ Addresses were the main way used to specify
location (they are used in most if not all of the message examples). Was
there some discussion at the face-to-face surrounding
this? Regards, Karen. From: Ham, Gary A
[mailto:hamg@BATTELLE.ORG] Folks, The attached schema files represent
a completed (with clearly defined placeholders for CIQ and Location) reference
schema for RM. Based on For Karen, If you would like to
specifically add the CIQ piece to the Types Schema (and tidy as necessary) I
would appreciate it. For all, If your mail server strips
off the attached files, just respond to my email hamg@battelle.org and I will send access to
a file download capability. Respectfully, Gary A. Ham
Senior Research
Scientist Battelle Memorial
Institute 540-288-5611
(office) 703-869-6241
(cell) "You would be surprised what you can
accomplish when you do not care who gets the credit." - Harry S.
Truman
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]