[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Meeting Next Week?
Hi Folks, We should have a meeting next week to get back in synch after the holidays. The TC , the IF SC and the Adoption SC are all meeting next Tuesday morning, so it would be crowded to squeeze our meeting into that set of timeslots, plus we need to include Karen and Renato, if he can manage it. So I suggest scheduling our next meeting for Thursday Jan 11 at 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. EST. If that doesn't work for you, please pipe up here and we can discuss it. If we don't hear from anyone with conflicts for this, I would appreciate it if Tim could schedule it for us. Also, I would appreciate it if anyone has a recollection of any other message elements where the ContactInformation package needs to be added other than the top level Resource Message unit for each message type and in the ResponsibleParty in OwnershipInformation. In the top level I used the form Contact:ContactInformation but I am wondering if it should just be ContactInformation: char since we don't have a message element: Contact? I hesitated to call it ContactRole, (the previous name for the relationship between the top level unit and the Contact Information cluste). I did that to avoid repeating an element from further downstream in the element chain. We may need a new label for the person sending the message, or responsible for sending the message (like MessageContact or MessageContactRole) to avoid having a term that is used in its own definition which would have if we used either ContactInformation:ContactInformation or ContactRole:ContactInformation (in which Contact Role is a defining characteristic with a specific list of types). I have attached my update of the main Element Reference Model so you can see what I have done. I didn't want to update all of the rest of the models until I am sure that this much is correctly aligned. I would also appreciate any discussion about whether we should consider adding the ContactInformation package to the ResponseInformation unit. My question is to those with more practical on-the-ground experience than I have as to whether or not a person other that the person sending a response type message would be the contact for that information. I certainly don't want to add wrinkles where we could get out of synch between the data dictionary, schema and models on the basis of my own speculation. Cheers, Rex -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]