[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency-if] Re: [emergency-msg] EDXL-AT & Situational Awareness
I agree and will put it on the agenda for our next meeting. Elysa At 06:16 PM 3/19/2007, Renato Iannella wrote: >On 17 Mar 2007, at 22:14, Rex Brooks wrote: > >>If at all possible, even if it means spending a lot of time in a >>crash project, we should build EDXL-RIM before or concurrently with >>any new specs. We need to get that EDXL-RIM sucker done yesterday! > >I think this is most critical at the moment. > >My feelings are that we currently haver 4 specs that, to some extent, >are incompatible. >There is no "common framework" between them and no consistent >mechanisms for >describing areas, people, orgs, event types and value lists (etc). > >I would recommend to the TC that the EDX-RIM become the next priority >item. > >And that all future specs (including updates to the current 4) be >based on the RIM. > >Cheers... Renato Iannella >NICTA > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]