[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM forOASIS review / 60-day public review
Thanks Elysa, I have validated all of the schemas (or schemata), individually and collectively, using XMLSPY. That means I tested all of the schemas/schemata including the included/imported schemas/schemata as well as the EDXL Common Reference, Types and individual message schemas/schemata which use those external schema, such as CIQ and geo-oasis. So I am satisfied that our work will stand up to testing. The zipped group of schemas (schemata) can be found at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/23014/EDXL-RM-SchemasAndExamplesV1.zip There is one thing that concerns me. In the specification Appendix A it says that "Schemas included in Appendix A are for reference only. The normative schemas can be found at http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-rm/v1.0/cd01/schemas/ However, checking that URL resulted in a "Not Found" screen. I believe assembling those schemas/schemata at that URL is something OASIS will do once we finish our submission, but I thought i should mention it because it would be a bad thing for the public to check that URL and reach a Not Found message. I can post a notice of the EDXL-RM Public Review to the Ontolog Forum http://ontolog.cim3.net/, which provides at least one well-regarded publicly-accessible mailing list. I have read the correspondence thread below, and I can vouch for this specification as co-chair of the Emergency management Messages and Notification Subcommittee. Cheers, Rex At 4:53 AM -0500 4/6/07, Elysa Jones wrote: >Good morning Rex! Could you take a look at the correspondence below >on the RM draft. Mary may be able to announce it today if we can >get it finished up - and we are ALMOST there. Two things - could >you as co-chair of the SC that generated the RM provide me a comment >that the schema is valid. Also, there is a new TC requirement to >post a notice in a known publicly-accessible mailing lists. You may >know of such a place but will otherwise ask Mary. Thanks, Elysa > >>Delivered-To: ejones@warningsystems.com >>X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1175852546-7c8e00580000-3eiNyE >>X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.128.10:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi >>X-Barracuda-Connect: ensim3.fuitadnet.com[67.15.28.16] >>X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1175852546 >>From: "Lee Tincher" <ltincher@evotecinc.com> >>To: "'Elysa Jones'" <ejones@warningsystems.com> >>Cc: "'Tom Wall'" <twall@evotecinc.com> >>X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM >>for OASIS review / 60-day public review >>Subject: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS >>review / 60-day public review >>Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:41:51 -0400 >>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 >>thread-index: Acd387iHKHa549RPTrqA4Tnmy8tl0wAO62TQ >>X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Network Telephone Spam Quarantine at >>pns.networktel.net >>X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.88 >>X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.88 using per-user scores of >>TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 >>tests=FUZZY_CPILL >>X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.13392 >> Rule breakdown below >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- >>-------------------------------------------------- >> 0.88 FUZZY_CPILL BODY: Attempt to obfuscate words in spam >> >>We referenced docs that existed in the public space already...Tom linked to >>those. >> >>I have validated the reference schema - it is hard without first localizing >>some of the additional external schemas it uses...but it is correct. I do >>agree however that it would be better for Rex or Tim to make this statement. >> >>I have absolutely no ideas on the mailing list - I'm not sure I really >>understand the intent... >> >>Thanks, >> >>Lee >> >>'We the unwilling, led by the unknowing have been doing the difficult with >>little for so long that we are now ready to tackle the impossible with >>nothing.' -- Local Fire communications reserve volunteer motto >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Elysa Jones [mailto:ejones@warningsystems.com] >>Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:49 PM >>To: Lee Tincher >>Subject: Re: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS review / >>60-day public review >> >>Hey Lee, Thanks for getting on this. >> >>Where exactly are the final files for me to reference in the >>submission to Mary? I saw the zip attachment to her message but are >>these in our doc repository? I usually provide her the link on the >>TC docs for each of the required pieces: .doc, html, pdf, xsd, etc. >> >>Can you provide me a statement that the schema is valid? Maybe this >>should come from Tim or Rex as co-chair of the SC. >> >>Also, any ideas of what "publicly-accessible mailing list we can >>announce this in? This is apparently a new requirement of the >>process as of March 1, 2007 - sigh >> >>Thanks! >>Elysa >> >>At 07:39 PM 4/5/2007, you wrote: >>>Looks great to me - your ball Elysa... >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Lee >>> >>>'We the unwilling, led by the unknowing have been doing the difficult with >>>little for so long that we are now ready to tackle the impossible with >>>nothing.' -- Local Fire communications reserve volunteer motto >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae >>>Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:44 PM >>>To: 'Timothy Grapes'; 'Lee Tincher'; 'Elysa Jones' >>>Cc: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org >>>Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS review / 60-day public >>>review >>> >>> >>>Hi folks, >>> >>> Lee, there were still a couple of problems with the files you sent - I >>>think I wasn't very clear with some of my >>>instructions, and some of the TC URIs didn't actually point to documents, >>so >>>I've gone ahead and fixed everything and >>>generated new PDF and HTML files. I'm sending them back to you for your >>okay >>>- it's always good to have another set of >>>eyes to review everything to make sure nothing got messed up. If everything >>>looks good, just have Elysa send me a note >>>saying we're good to go. There are a couple of other pieces needed just to >>>tidy up the paperwork: >>> >>>- a statement from Elysa certifying that the schemas are valid, and >>>- any known publicly-accessible mailing lists that I should include on the >>>review notification (this is a new >>>requirement in the TC Process as of 1 March) >>> >>>I'd love to get this announced tomorrow if you folks can find the time to >>>check it over. >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Mary -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]