OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Fwd: Update: Re: Revised RM issues list


Title: Fwd: Update: Re: Revised RM issues list
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 05:36:16 -0700
To: "Timothy Grapes" <tgrapes@evotecinc.com>, "'Rex Brooks'" <rexb@starbourne.com>, "'Aymond, Patti'" <patti.aymond@iem.com>, "'Ham, Gary A'" <hamg@BATTELLE.ORG>, "'Karen Robinson'" <Karen.Robinson@nicta.com.au>, emergency-msg@lists.oasus-open.org
From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
Subject: Update: Re: Revised RM issues list
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
Hi Folks,

I finally figured out how to get the Line Numbers to work so that we can stay on the same page as we go through the document reviewing and responding to the issues list.

I downloaded the untouched "Editable Source" again from Mary McRae's official announcement, where the Line Numbers start with "1" at "introduction."

I will use that document for the Line Numbers for all of the issues, except for that "Front Matter" section, which is not numbered in the Publicv Review version.

Front Matter is a small proportion of the 502 issues we have as of now.

I will go back into the first issues we dealt with and update the Line Numbers to reflect the correct Line Numbersd from the unedited "Editable Source," which will remain unedited throughout the process.

That way all of the issues will have one single source for the Line Numbers separate from the redline version. I will keep the edits of the proposed resolutions we develop in the ongoing "redline" version, which will remain separate from the original unedited "Editable Source" document.

So the unedited "Editable Source" will always reflect the correct Line Numbers from the Public Review version, and I will send out the redline version at the end, or as requested if anyone wishes it or when/if it is necessary for someone else to take over the ongoing task of keeping the redline current with the progress we make through the comments received and recorded in the IssuesList.

I will take the updated IssuesList Tim sent out yesterday and add as many of the remaining Issues as I can before our next meeting next Thursday, 10 May 2007.

Hopefully I will be able to get them ALL recorded so that we can be in synch with the current raw Issues List from now on. It may take an all-nighter, but so be it. I don't want to make a career out of this and I don't want it hanging over our heads (my head).

This way we can keep in synch with the updated version of the Issues List (which will get a new filename version-number each week) as we go through as many Issues/Comments each week.

This should take care of the situation and ensure that we don't have a repeat of my frustration yesterday. My apologies for that. Back to back face to face meetings the previous two weeks can do that to ya. (Merkle and Ellis understand, since they also work in the SOA-RM Reference Architecture SC.)

Just as a side note, I really wanted the procedure for handling EDXL-RM Issues settled so that we can continue work on the EDXL-RIM soon. The Situational Reporting Requirements is an issue I hope we can get to soon, but EDXL-RM takes priority.

Cheers,
Rex

At 5:59 PM -0400 5/3/07, Timothy Grapes wrote:
 
 
Thanks,
 
Tim
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/785 - Release Date: 5/2/2007 2:16 PM


Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Issu#26949C.xls (XLS4/«IC») (0026949C)


--
 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309


--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]