[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Re: My comment on the geo-oasis namespace URI
Concur. Rex At 4:49 PM -0400 8/21/07, Ham, Gary A wrote: >Sorry that I could not make the meeting today. Hassles all around. >Still, I 100% concur with Alessandro's comment. All references >should be in URI format. > >Respectfully, > >Gary Ham > >www.grandpaham.com > > > >________________________________ > >From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com] >Sent: Tue 8/21/2007 3:35 PM >To: Alessandro Triglia; rexb@starbourne.com; >emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: [emergency-msg] Re: My comment on the geo-oasis namespace URI > > > >Thanks for the clarification Alessandro, > >I don't know why that formulation was chosen, especially since I >prefer the formulation you mention in parentheses. However, the HTTP >scheme was not, as far as I know or recall, an intended use, though I >would say now that it should be because developers will almost >undoubtedly be using XMLHttpRequest objects in Ajax for asynchronous >requests and responses whether we allow for it or not. > >So we may want to do this when we submit EDXL-RM for its second >60-day Public Review. We can resolve these issues together, since >they are not confined to geo-oasis, and I want to make sure that we >can have Gary Ham on board when we do that, and possibly reach out to >Karen Robinson to see if she can join us, too, for these schema >decisions. > >Cheers, >Rex > >At 3:14 PM -0400 8/21/07, Alessandro Triglia wrote: >>Rex, >> >>This is a clarification in response to your question on my comment about the >>geo-oasis namespace URI (now issue #532). >> >>My comment says that the namespace URI is "incorrect". By that, I did not >>mean that it is syntactically incorrect, but that it does not comply with >>the OASIS rules for the creation of namespace URIs [1]. The URI in question >>is: >> >> http://www.oasis-open.org/oasis/10 >> >>Given that in many other cases, URNs have been chosen by the EM TC as >>namespace URIs (e.g., "urn:oasis:names:tc:emergency:EDXL:RM:1.0:........", >>it is not clear why the above form has been chosen for the geo-oasis >>namespace URI. >> >>Also note the following statement in [1]: >> >>"URIs intended for use as HTTP scheme URI namespace names should be formally >>identified by the TC (as early in the specification design process as >>possible) so that the OASIS TC Administration may check for possible naming >>collisions, approve the proposed resolution target resource [namespace >>document], and properly reserve the URI - including possibly reservation of >>(all) space below the hierarchical level of the candidate NS URI". >> >>Has the above been done? >> >>Note also issue #562, which says that the geo-oasis schema needs to be >>published as part of an (OASIS) standard--either in the EDXL-RM standard >>itself, or in any other (OASIS) standard. Otherwise, EDXL-RM cannot make >>normative use of it. >> >>Alessandro >> >> >>---------------- >> >>[1]: >>http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/resourceNamingCom >>mentaryV07.html#NamespaceDesign > > >-- >Rex Brooks >President, CEO >Starbourne Communications Design >GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison >Berkeley, CA 94702 >Tel: 510-898-0670 -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-898-0670
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]