OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Reminder: Meeting in very few minutes RE: [emergency-msg]Follow-up: Please check Section 3.11.3


Title: Reminder: Meeting in very few minutes RE: [emergency-msg]
Reminder we have a meeting in a few minutes to approve EDXL-RM for it second (final-we hope) 60-Day Public Review.

Like you needed the reminder, eh?
Rex


At 9:36 AM -0600 1/31/08, Patti Aymond wrote:
Tim,
 
Yup. You're right. My bad.
 
Patti
 
Patti Iles Aymond, PhD
Chief Technology Director
DQSI Corporation
19218 North 5th Street
Covington, LA 70433
(985) 871-7472 x 211 (voice)
(985) 871-1072 (fax)
www.dqsi.com

From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:tgrapes@evotecinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:57 AM
To: 'Rex Brooks'; emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Alessandro Triglia'; hamgva@cox.net; 'Patti Iles Aymond'; ltincher@evotecinc.com; dellis@sandia.gov
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Follow-up: Please check Section 3.11.3
 
Rex,
I believe at some point we added the second bullet but didn't delete the first.  The first bullet is incorrect and should be removed since a ReleaseResource message can in fact be an initial message.  It does not require a previous message.
 
Thanks,
 
Tim
 
From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:26 AM
To: Timothy Grapes'; emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Alessandro Triglia'; hamgva@cox.net; Patti Iles Aymond; ltincher@evotecinc.com; dellis@sandia.gov
Subject: [emergency-msg] Follow-up: Please check Section 3.11.3
 
Hi again Folks,
 
I'm writing about this again because I think we have to correct or clarify this before EDXL-RM goes out, so this time I'm going to go into detail.
 
3.11 is the Release Resource message. the two bullets in 3.11.3 are:
 
How can subelements of ResponseInformation be required if the parent element ResourceInformation:ResponseInfromation is optional?
 
I think we need to either delete one of the bullets to be consistent, or else make ResourceInformation:ResponseInformation Required, which means changing the diagram and the table and the Element Matrix. Or else we leave a conundrum. Regardless, we need to agree on what we do or don't do on this.
 
Cheers,
Rex
 
 
 
Hi Folks,

Please check bullets 7 and 8 of Section 3.11.3. They repeat each other and somewhat contradict each other. I'm not going to stop or change it since this is taking longer than I thought it would. I'm keeping a page of notes on things that I think need to be looked over but this is the first one that actually caused me to stop long enough to send out a message about it. I have incorporated everyone else's proofing, so if you find anything, please keep a list and check the next version I post against your list, since it would not be a good idea for me to stop and rewind now that I'm going through it in great detail.


Cheers,
Rex
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]