[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency-rim] Proposed Agenda for Meeting Today
Ahhh, I see, Don, I'll try to be more clear. ;-) Cheers, Rex McGarry, Donald P. wrote: > Roger. I must have misunderstood when you stated adding it to location & contact information as literal. > > Don McGarry > The MITRE Corp. > dmcgarry@mitre.org > (315) 838-2669 Office > (703) 595-9375 Cell > Sent via Blackberry > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com> > To: McGarry, Donald P. > Cc: 'emergency-rim@lists.oasis-open.org' <emergency-rim@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Thu Jun 03 11:28:21 2010 > Subject: Re: [emergency-rim] Proposed Agenda for Meeting Today > > I don't know. I don't have any preconceptions about it. The only place I > have seen temporal elements abstracted into their own category is in the > DoDAF Metamodel 2.0, and I don't think I want to follow that model > exactly. So I'm just suggesting we acknowledge it and table it for after > we finish CIQ. I wasn't expecting to make a decision on it today. This > follows the general parliamentary procedure of having a topic > introduction, putting it on the agenda for the future and having > research ACTION items then having "readings" of recommendations by those > who do the research. We don't follow that model all that closely, but > it's sorta what I fall back on. > > Cheers, > Rex > > McGarry, Donald P. wrote: > >> Rex- >> Good thought. I'm not sure how we can integrate that into the profiles though. Wouldn't that be adding elements? >> >> Don McGarry >> The MITRE Corp. >> dmcgarry@mitre.org >> (315) 838-2669 Office >> (703) 595-9375 Cell >> Sent via Blackberry >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com> >> To: McGarry, Donald P. >> Cc: emergency-rim@lists.oasis-open.org <emergency-rim@lists.oasis-open.org> >> Sent: Thu Jun 03 11:05:44 2010 >> Subject: Re: [emergency-rim] Proposed Agenda for Meeting Today >> >> Thanks Don, >> >> I don't have any thoughts on this. It's ambitious, and I'm not sure >> we'll actually finish the DE Conformance discussion, but it's certainly >> worth a try. I do have an addition. I was planning to let the group know >> that we will want to add Temporal Information to Contact Information and >> Location Information as an information category which occurs across EDXL >> and needs to have its own guidelines if not an outright encapsulation >> along the lines of the OASIS Where Profile of the OGC GML and our EDXL >> Profile of CIQ. >> >> Cheers, >> Rex >> >> McGarry, Donald P. wrote: >> >> >>> 1. Short illustration of an issue I found with serialization of >>> lists >>> >>> 2. Namespace issues with re-usable / common types across EDXL >>> >>> 3. Finish DE Conformance discussion >>> >>> 4. Back to the ciq work >>> >>> >>> >>> Hopefully we can stay on task to complete items 1-3 at a minimum. I >>> really would like to get back to completing number 4 as it is starting >>> to hold up the initiation of final testing and public release of my >>> HAVE and RM libraries. Also there is reliance from the SitRep work on >>> it as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> If anyone has thoughts/additions feel free to add them! >>> >>> >>> >>> Don McGarry >>> >>> The MITRE Corp. >>> >>> Office: 315-838-2669 >>> >>> Cell: 703-595-9375 >>> >>> dmcgarry@mitre.org <mailto:dmcgarry@mitre.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-898-0670
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]