Re: [emergency-rim] EDXL-RIM Common Types template request

[Rex Brooks <rex.brooks@ncoic.org>]

FWIW, Werner

My preference is h) lower case. I would like to suggest that we do this 
consistently in edxl-sitrep, edxl-de and edxl-have. Of course we need to 
put it before the TC after our meeting next week.

Cheers,
Rex

On 2/16/11 10:00 AM, Werner.Joerg@iem.com wrote:
> All,
>
> Given the feedback from the TC Admin, I am considering submitting a revised template request. Before proceeding, I would like your input on the points below.
>
> 1) Work Product Title: "Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Reference Information Model (RIM): Common Types, v1.0"
> Reason for change: expanded abbreviations and hyphen elimination from previous "EDXL RIM - Common Types".
>
> 2) Work Product Abbreviation (WPA): considering alternatives
>    a) "EDXL-RIM-CT-v1.0"
>    b) "EDXL-CT-v1.0"
> or using "_" for version separation
>    c) "EDXL-RIM-CT_v1.0"
>    d) "EDXL-CT_v1.0"
> or lower case counterparts
>    e) "edxl-rim-ct-v1.0"
>    f) "edxl-ct-v1.0"
>    g) "edxl-rim-ct_v1.0"
>    h) "edxl-ct_v1.0"
>    i) other?
> Note that WPA determines the file name of the work products. So far, we have not been consistent in the EM-TC, using upper case, lower case or even mixed forms (e.g. emergency_edxl_have-1.0, EDXL-RM-SPEC-V1.0, EDXL-DE_Spec_v1.0, cap-v1.1-ipaws-profile-v1.0). OASIS does not impose any particular format, but indicates that there is a tendency towards lower case notations for file names, and I personally believe that it would be nice to have a consistent notation within the TC.
>
> 3) Namespaces
>
>    - Document URI:
>      http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/emergency/edxl/rim/ct or other variants derived from WPA.
>
>    - xml namespace:
>      urn:oasis:names:tc:emergency:edxl:rim:ct or other variants derived from WPA.
>
> Thanks for your feedback,
> Werner