[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] What do want in a FAQ for a new spec
On Feb 25, 2004, at 1:48 PM, Rex Brooks wrote: > Having beaten myself to shreds on the WSRP Primer (just one section of > it), I'm not ready to start an implementation guide real soon, and I > would suggest that one of the representatives of one of the firms in > the TC who have developed implementations would be better qualified > for that. Just to clarify the process here. The TC has assigned the MSG SC the task of the implementer's guide, which was suppose to have a draft delivered in Q3 2003. Everyone has been busy with various things, I understand, but at the same time this is still the responsibility of the SC and specifically the accountability of the Chairs, to bring it back to the TC. If the SC is not properly "staffed" to handle such a requirement, then the SC needs to ask for help so that we can get this item completed. As it stands, it is simply an outstanding Action Item the SC has failed to deliver regardless of what else has gone on. If the flood of questions that have hit the public comment and CAP lists recent have reinforced anything, it is that we need an implementer's guide to bring clarity to implementing CAP. Not meaning to be harsh - just being honest about the situation. If the situation needs to change, then the SC needs to bring a suggestion to the TC for consideration. Until that time, I can only press the SC to complete their assigned tasks. Allen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]