Re: [emergency] Re: [emergency-comment] RE: Content ( was RE: [emergency-comment] RE: [CAP] RE: CAP-list digest...)

[R. Allen Wyke <emergency-tc@earthlink.net>]

On Mar 26, 2004, at 6:37 PM, Art Botterell wrote:

> At 5:11 PM -0500 3/26/04, R. Allen Wyke wrote:
>> I just feel like we are at Square 1/2 - not 1.
>
> I'm confused.

Which is certainly ok, but having said that I suggest you might want to 
consider sitting back and "listening" to the conversation/discussion we 
are having, and then trying to ask questions after it reaches a point 
where it is more clear. Per that, I do not feel the need to respond to 
what you have asked below, as those were answered in a different email 
and do not pertain to what this thread is about.

> Are we talking about a specific proposal here, or are we still arguing 
> over personal opinions of the relative completeness of CAP 1.0?  (On 
> that latter point I though we'd all agreed that it was what we'd 
> approved for now, but that there was plenty more work yet to be done.  
> Does anyone disagree with that?)
>
> If there's a specific proposal on the table... and if we're going to 
> discuss it now instead of waiting till all the comments (if any) from 
> the balloting are in... then could someone please restate what it is?
>
> - Art
>