emergency message

Subject: RE: [emergency] FW: [legalxml-intjustice] GJXDM subset schema exa mple and documen tation

From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>
To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@ingr.com>, "'Carl Reed'" <creed@opengis.org>, "'Rex Brooks'" <rexb@starbourne.com>, "'R. Allen Wyke'" <emergency-tc@earthlink.net>, "'Art Botterell'" <acb@incident.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:02:56 -0500

Claude L Bullard wrote:
> I'm waiting for the W3C to tell us that all of the 
> new specifications require RDF ontologies.
	My hope is that if anyone tries this, we'll be able to tell
them to simply use GRDDL[1] instead. Given GRDDL, the RDF partisans
really can't complain any more about non-RDF encodings since GRDDL
provides the mechanism for RDF processors to treat non-RDF XML objects
as though they were RDF encoded.

		bob wyman


[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec

References:
- RE: [emergency] FW: [legalxml-intjustice] GJXDM subset schema exa mple and documen tation
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>