[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] Final editorial corrections?
At 3:37 PM -0500 3/31/04, Bob Wyman wrote: >I think you should get a formal opinion on this from the OASIS >leadership. Yes, I've put in a call to Jamie Clark to ask him to guide us on this. > Also, please note that the distinction between changes which >are "substantive" and those which are "non-substantive" is often the >source of considerable debate... That's why I suggested a "consent agenda" approach... if anybody on the TC objects to any proposed edit then it would automatically be held over for consideration on the next go-round. That way we don't need to bog down in pointless debate while still allowing ourselves to make any uncontroversial corrections. My sense, specifically as regards your expressed concerns about the schema, is that it seems like everybody involved agrees as to the intent, so if somebody can come forward with a specific suggestion on how better to express that intent, and if nobody objects, we could take this opportunity to make that editorial adjustment before we publish. But if anyone objects to doing that, or if staff indicates that making final edits would deviate from OASIS practice, then we can certainly leave the spec as-is. - Art
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]