[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] Groups - ICS-201-draft0.2.xsd uploaded
I agree with Rick. Don't open liaisons or set dependencies on other specifications and standards unless absolutely necessary, meaning, your specification can't be used without them. 1. Your specification will be tied to the evolution of the other specification, and 2. It might lose. len From: CONSULTRAC [mailto:rcarlton@consultrac.com] I think that our attempting to define a "holistic" XML-based ICS 201 is a flawed approach and beyond our scope. Perhaps we should prepare an XML-API process spec that acknowledges the specific elements and name types referenced in the ratified NIMS-construct, but leave the front end formatting to the marketplace. In my view this places us where we belong; at the "standardized data exchange protocol" level rather than the "applications/forms development" level. The latter posture suggests certain product biases that I do not think we want attached to the committee's work.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]