[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: [emergency-comment] Fwd: CAP Implimentation inCompassLDE
Rex et al : It may be possible to address these requirements as an extension of the joint E-Government / ebXMLRegistry Tc effort that aims to publish best practices around collaborative development of content. finest regards Carl Mattocks <quote who="Rex Brooks"> > Thanks, Allen, > > It looks like the time has come to address this overall issue. I > uploaded a general presentation on WSS, borrowed from the WSRP TC > which is one of several areas of concern that all intersect in this > specific issue of establishing trust networks. In this case the area > is web services. In line with the various transport-specific > requirements, we might want to consider gathering requirements for an > EM-specific registry, especially in the context of developing the > message-wrapper for setting context(s). A great deal of work has > already been done in ebXML and UDDI, so we are far from starting from > a zero point. > > I was going to upload the presentations and discussions we have been > having this week for related issues in security in the WSRP meetings, > but they have gotten too specific to be valuable in a more general > context, let alone in narrowing back down to a CAP-specific > discussion, and we still have one more today. However, it has been > instructive. > > An EM Registry need not be web-only, but could have sections per > transport mechanism with recommendations for how to organize it to > list a registrant's organizational capabilities, memberships, > protocols/standards supported, etc. While that approach might entail > multiple or repeated entries where an organization spans transports, > it could be organized in such a way as to make establishing trust > relationships reliable without having too great an overhead cost. > > Regardless, such a registry would need to have the support and > cooperation of the governmental jurisdictional authorities from the > local to the international levels, but the movement toward > cooperation in these areas appears to be favorable, for now at least. > > Ciao, > Rex > > At 6:52 AM -0400 8/6/04, R. Allen Wyke wrote: >>Note that I moved this discussion over to the TC thread and took it >>off the Public Comment list. >> >>Also, please notice that what JD is asking is not "what's possible", >>but rather "what's official". >> >>On Aug 5, 2004, at 8:08 PM, David Aylward wrote: >> >>>Claude: >>> >>>Yes, but not yet in the best way, integrating the data flow into and out >>>of the CAD system. Obviously that requires an interface with the CAD >>>system, which we are looking forward to doing soon. >>> >>>David Aylward >>>Director >>>The ComCARE Alliance >>>888 17th St., N.W. >>>Washington, DC 20006 >>>202-429-0574 Extension 247 >>>202-296-2962 (fax) >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:len.bullard@intergraph.com] >>>Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:16 PM >>>To: David Aylward; R. Allen Wyke; emergency-comment@lists.oasis-open.org >>>Cc: jdm@compasscom.com >>>Subject: RE: [emergency-comment] Fwd: CAP Implimentation in CompassLDE >>> >>>Has that been tried with the 911 systems in your membership >>>areas? >>> >>>len bullard >>>intergraph public safety >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: David Aylward [mailto:daylward@comcare.org] >>>Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 3:51 PM >>>To: R. Allen Wyke; emergency-comment@lists.oasis-open.org >>>Cc: jdm@compasscom.com >>>Subject: RE: [emergency-comment] Fwd: CAP Implimentation in CompassLDE >>> >>> >>>There are a number of ways to do this, but the architecture our members >>>have developed and trialed in the field with CAP assumes that: >>> >>>1. any emergency agency (broad definition of "agency") can initiate a >>>CAP message (down the road there will need to be some rules about that) >>> >>>2. either the initiating application, or a message broker serving it, >>>either has the addresses (a local system), or queries a directory for >>>the electronic addresses of agencies which have registered to receive >>>it, and then transmits the message >>> >>>3. one example of such a directory is the Emergency Provider Access >>>Directory (EPAD) we are putting together, helped by a DOJ grant. There >>>agencies register who they are, what service they provide, what >>>incidents they want to hear about, the geographic area(s) of their >>>incident interest, and the address(es) to which they want data sent. >>> >>>4. Thus, for example, each client agency of yours would register the >>>CompassCom electronic address for the incident types it wanted to >>>receive for its area. >>> >>>5. Message initiators would not need to know recipient agencies. >>> >>> >>>We put a short Flash on our website (www.comcare.org) to illustrate >>>this. The link is on the left hand column of the website's front page. >>> >>> >>>David Aylward >>>Director >>>The ComCARE Alliance >>>888 17th St., N.W. >>>Washington, DC 20006 >>>202-429-0574 Extension 247 >>>202-296-2962 (fax) >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: R. Allen Wyke [mailto:emergency-tc@earthlink.net] >>>Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 1:30 AM >>>To: emergency-comment@lists.oasis-open.org >>>Cc: jdm@compasscom.com >>>Subject: [emergency-comment] Fwd: CAP Implimentation in CompassLDE >>> >>>Good question JD. I have forwarded this to the EM TC Public Comment >>>list. >>> >>>Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>>From: "J.D. Main" <jdm@compasscom.com> >>>>Date: August 4, 2004 12:35:59 PM EDT >>>>To: emergency-tc@earthlink.net >>>>Subject: CAP Implimentation in CompassLDE >>>>Reply-To: jdm@compasscom.com >>>> >>>>Allen, >>>> >>>>CompassCom plans to add the CAP message to our API and thus >>>>make our Mobile Asset Tracking product line "CAP Compatible" I >>>>understand the format and purpose of the CAP message. I am a bit >>>>fuzzy on where they would come from in a real implimentation. In a >>>>real sense, I must set up a CAP listener - who is broadcasting? Is >>>>there a process of registering an implimentation of my application >>>with >>>>those agencies who would broadcast a CAP message? My apologies >>>>if these questions seem basic, but I have not discovered any >>>>documentation to clear this up. >>>> >>>>Please let me know what you think. >>>> >>>>Best Regards, >>>> >>>>J.D. Main >>>> >>>>CompassCom, Inc. >>>>6770 S. Dawson Circle, Unit 1A >>>>Centennial, CO 80112 >>>>PH: 303-680-3221 >>>>Fax: 303-766-2488 >>>>www.compasscom.com >>>> >>>> >>>>******************************************************* >>>>This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may >>>>contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. >>>> >>>>If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >>>any >>>>dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you >>>have >>>>received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the >>>>message and its attachments and notifyCompassCom, Inc. >>>>immediately at solutions@compasscom.com >>>>******************************************************* >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > > -- > Rex Brooks > GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth > W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com > Email: rexb@starbourne.com > Tel: 510-849-2309 > Fax: By Request > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of > the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > -- Carl Mattocks co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC CEO CHECKMi v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 www.CHECKMi.com Semantically Smart Compendiums (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]