[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] CAP and Signatures/Encryption
You're right... but since the question has arisen I'm thinking it might not hurt to be explicit that the MUST NOT clause only constrains the interior of the CAP message and not the transport environment. - Art At 11:58 AM -0500 1/25/05, Bob Wyman wrote: >Art Botterell wrote: >> How about if we changed the last line to read "Other XML >> encryption mechanisms MUST NOT be used within CAP Alert Messages, >> although other forms of encryption MAY be applied in the transmission >> of CAP messages."? > The wording you propose would do no harm, however, it would be more >traditional for a format specification to remain silent on the issue of >transport layer mechanisms. > > bob wyman
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]