[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: valueListUrn (was Re: [emergency] Addition ideas for EDXLDistribution)
At 9:00 PM -0600 5/2/05, Ellis, David wrote: >2. I would prefer to use strongly typed values >rather than general string values like URN. In >the example I generated, I used simple letters >(e.g. a, b, c, d Š) in the "ValueListUrn" >elements. Would this put us back in the business of controlling, or at least pre-identifying, the various value-lists? I think we were hoping that anyone who needed to could create and publish their own value tables... in effect letting other processes (like NEIM) develop such lists without our becoming embroiled in, or being delayed by, the processes of creating or selecting them. URNs simply provide a way for lists to have unique names without the need for an ongoing management activities. Is there a better way to achieve that? - Art
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]