RE: [emergency] EDXL Target Areas for device coded recipients

["Daconta, Michael" <Michael.Daconta@dhs.gov>]

Hi Everyone,
 
I have not been able to follow the email trail on this.  Would Kon or Art (or both) write up the issue and 
what they see as the pros and cons of the recommended resolution?
 
Regards,
 
 - Mike

________________________________

From: Elysa Jones [mailto:ejones@warningsystems.com]
Sent: Fri 5/27/2005 7:01 AM
To: Kon Wilms; Art Botterell
Cc: Emergency Mgt XML TC
Subject: Re: [emergency] EDXL Target Areas for device coded recipients



Friends,

Kon and Art have distinct opinions about the Target Areas for device coded
recipients.  They both have valid points that need to be discussed by the
entire TC to reach consensus through our normal collaborative
efforts.  Unfortunately the discussion on the list has veered off the
technical path.  I apologize for not being available this week to moderate
and aid in this discussion but have been traveling and unable to stay in
touch.  I would encourage both of you to take a day or two off this topic
and I further encourage others in the TC to express your technical
opinion.  We have a TC meeting on Tuesday and I would like continue the
discussion there for a short period of time.  We will dedicate not more
than 15 minutes to this topic as we have other issues to discuss as
well.  I would like each opinion to be voiced during that call in a clear,
concise, technical manner.  Please put any supporting text for your
position on the list prior to the call.  I will post an agenda in another
day or two on the site.  Have a safe and enjoyable Memorial Day weekend,

Sincerely,
Elysa Jones, Chair
OASIS EM-TC
256-880-8702 x102


At 12:37 PM 5/26/2005, Kon Wilms wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 09:23 -0400, Art Botterell wrote:
> > Check the attitude at the door, will you, Kon?  This really isn't
> > about you.
>
>No, I will not check my attitude at the door.
>
>If you think I will sit still when you misquote me, patronize me, and
>belittle my contributions as if I am not even a member of this group,
>you are gravely mistaken.
>
>You have a good track record of playing this game - along with the token
>'its not about you' card. Minus the fact that your insults get bolder in
>nature with every iteration.
>
>I am not here to play kindergarten-level games with you, I am here to
>work on a specification.
>
> > Personally, for all the reasons I've explained before, I think it
> > would be an interoperability mistake to encourage building system-
> > specific codes into the targetArea block.  Besides which, in this
> > case it would be misleading, since the router isn't necessarily in
> > the target area.
>
>I'm not going to repeat myself, because you obviously aren't listening
>to what I am saying. You just want to argue this with excuses until I
>get fed up attempting to explain it to you. And yes, the router is in
>the target area.
>
> > If you needs specific addressing a mechanism is provided, which is
> > <recipientAddress>.  Or for even more flexibility you could hold your
> > nose and simply use a <keyword>.
>
>There you go again. Good attempt at the age-old shut up, sit down, and
>use what I told you to line.
>
>I am done discussing this with you. As was the case last time, this is
>going to go nowhere. So I will write a full proposal to the group. No
>doubt you *will* reply to this email though, in order to get the last
>word in. Have at it.
>
>Cheers
>Kon
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php