[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] Groups - Draft Meeting Notes 5-31-05.doc uploaded
Kon, Thanks for your comments on the meeting notes, I will add the comment as you suggest. As for the target area - I encourage all TC members that have issues with using keyword for the non geo-related targeting to comment on the list. It is my hope that we can achieve consensus on this topic by the next TC call. While putting together the DOM that I posted 6/1, I noticed that responseType had been removed from the 5/17 draft and put in keyword. This makes sense to me as a managed list item. I didn't realize this when I brought it up in the meeting. I did not list it separately in the 5/31 DOM. If anyone has issues with this, please respond to the list. Thanks, Elysa Jones, Chair OASIS EM-TC Engineering Program Manager Warning Systems, Inc. 256-880-8702 x102 At 07:12 PM 6/1/2005, Kon Wilms wrote: > > The document named Draft Meeting Notes 5-31-05.doc has been submitted > >I just want to add that on issue 2 there was discussion that the >definition of targetarea (as it currently appears in the EDXL draft >document) would be changed in such a way to indicate to implementers >that the distribution element area keyword can also be used for >content-targeting of messages. > >If keyword is the desired approach then the above would clarify it. I >see the point to targetarea being geo-related only. I personally prefer >the suggestion Renato has brought forward which would be that of >alternate targeting blocks for non-geographic use. This is part style >(grouping like elements so as not to clutter the distribution header for >readability purposes) and function (grouping these targets so as to >allow for tracing content delivery chains at a high level). > >Cheers >Kon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]