[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon
I like the element names showing the specific origin of an element name, such as Art shows below. This removes any doubts as to where the element origin is from when looking at the XML schema. Regards, Tom Merkle CapWIN: www.capwin.org Phone: (301) 614-3720 Cell Phone: (240) 375-1966 Fax: (301) 614-0581 e-mail: tmerkle@capwin.org CapWIN 6305 Ivy Lane Suite 300 Capital Office Park Greenbelt, MD 20770 -----Original Message----- From: Art Botterell [mailto:acb@incident.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:41 PM To: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon On Jun 16, 2005, at 6/16/05 7:11 PM, Renato Iannella wrote: > Perhaps a good compromise is to add explicit (attribute) information > that indicates the spatial reference system used by the element, and > that it is the external edge? We've stayed clear of attributes for various reasons, but would it achieve the same end to name the elements something like <wgs84polygon> and <wgs84circle>? - Art --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]