[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon
If we place the reference system in the element name, we will be forced to expand the specification to include elements for all of the possible reference systems. I personally prefer using an attribute, but I would be o.k. with an element that indicates the spatial reference system as a sub-element of <polygon> and <circle>. Patti Patti Iles Aymond, PhD Senior Scientist Bioterrorism Preparedness & Response Innovative Emergency Management, Inc. Managing Risk in a Complex World 8555 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 100 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 (225) 952-8228 (phone) (225) 952-8122 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Art Botterell [mailto:acb@incident.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 9:41 PM To: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon On Jun 16, 2005, at 6/16/05 7:11 PM, Renato Iannella wrote: > Perhaps a good compromise is to add explicit (attribute) > information that indicates the spatial reference system used by the > element, and that it is the external edge? We've stayed clear of attributes for various reasons, but would it achieve the same end to name the elements something like <wgs84polygon> and <wgs84circle>? - Art --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE: http://www.ieminc.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]