[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] RE: Structure
I disagree with the GeoPolitical Information System SC just being listed under the EDXL work. GeoStuff affects sensors, CAP, EDXL, etc. I also think it shouldn't be named "GeoPolitical" (we should stay away from politics and religion :-) I agree targeting of messages is one thing that should be addressed, but also the geo information content of messages as well. We are not just concerned with political areas but other geographic designations as well, geometric areas (horizontal, vertical, etc), geographic features, the whole range of geo types. Dave David M. Danko GIS Standards Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 8620 Westwood Center Drive Vienna, VA 22182-2214 USA E-mail: ddanko@esri.com Tel: 703-506-9515 x 8011 Mobile: 703-989-1863 Fax: 703-506 9514 -----Original Message----- From: michellearaymond@gmail.com [mailto:michellearaymond@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:14 PM To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [emergency] RE: Structure Here's my take on potential sub-com structures Emergency Management Sub-Committees Messaging and Notification (communication with people) CAP Systems and Sensors (workflow and system communication) Metrics and Analysis (operational analysis) Distribution and Infrastructure (protocol and architecture) EDXL Geopolitical Information System (targeting of messages) Task Forces Use Cases Demonstrations / Presentations - Michelle Raymond
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]