Re: [emergency] URN namespace for EDXL

[Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>]

On 29 Jun 2005, at 16:49, Art Botterell wrote:

> We're specifying them as enumerated values for that particular 
> datum... why would they need individual identities?

Sure, you can define (and identify) a data type in XML Schema, but what
I was originally referring to was developing a unique vocabulary for
the terms used in Status and Type (not dependent on an XML Schema).

For example, if you look at page 40 of the SAML spec [1], you can
see the vocab terms used are all urn identified.

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
Project Leader, NICTA, Brisbane, QLD, AUSTRALIA
P: +61 7 3000 0484 F: +61 7 3000 0480 M: +61 4 1313 2206
E: renato@nicta.com.au W: http://nicta.com.au

[1] <http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-core-2.0-os.pdf>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed.