Re: [emergency] Groups - CAP 1.1 Issues List recommendations from MSG SC (CAP_1.1_Issues_7-22-05.xls) uploaded

[Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>]

On 23 Jul 2005, at 06:55, acb@incident.com wrote:

> Note that item 11 was forwarded without a recommendation, pending
> discussion in the full TC.

Issue 11 says "Suggests addition of a CAP-version-number element within 
the CAP message."

The CAP URN namespace identifier, eg:

   <alert xmlns = "urn:oasis:names:tc:emergency:cap:1.1">

indicates the version of CAP being used.

Even though it is "1.1", a processor needs to understand that the entire
URN (string) represents the CAP V 1.1 spec.


Cheers...  Renato Iannella
National ICT Australia (NICTA)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed.