Re: [emergency] EDXL_DE - Notes from the meeting to help with minutes and issues list.

[Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>]

On 19 Aug 2005, at 13:01, Art Botterell wrote:

> Let me pose the question more broadly: Can we reasonably assume (or  
> impose a requirement) that all public and private network addresses  
> must have an agreed-upon URI expression?

I assume the requirement is interoperability and uniqueness for  
identifiers.
And *a* solution is to ensure they are cast as URIs.


Cheers...  Renato Iannella
National ICT Australia (NICTA)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed.