Re: [emergency] Signatures etc

[Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>]

On 17 Jan 2006, at 03:36, Ellis, David wrote:

Therefore even if other applications would sign entire EDXL-DE messages, we do not see this as the norm.

Others may.

I suggest that to support Signatures at all levels (payload and EDXL it self) that we add an explicit reference

to the <ds:Signature> element (from the Digital Signature schema) at both the top EDXLDistribution and

ContentObject levels.

I suggest we do not use the "any" element mechanism. Currently this "any" definition

also allows " It may also be used for experimental extensions; "  - which is not ideal for a final spec.  

Cheers...  Renato Iannella

National ICT Australia (NICTA)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed.