Re: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject

[Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>]

On 31 Jan 2006, at 04:05, Elysa Jones wrote:

> I don't think anyone on the TC is interested in going back for a 60- 
> day review at this point in the EDXL-DE.  If anyone feels strongly  
> the other way with respect to this change, please let me know.

Not that I feel strongly about it, but we should be aware that the
OASIS TC process defines "Substantive Change" as:

   "a change to a specification that would require a compliant  
application or
    implementation to be modified or rewritten in order to remain  
compliant."

This is undoubtedly the case for the current version of EDXL-DE.


Cheers...  Renato Iannella
National ICT Australia (NICTA)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed.