Re: [emergency] Em-Msg SC Recommends TC vote on HAVE as Committee Draft for Public Review

[Elysa Jones <ejones@warningsystems.com>]

Didn't we want Dr. Bass to review before we proceeded to public comment? Elysa

At 04:56 PM 8/10/2006, Rex Brooks wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>The EM Msg & Notifications SC has voted unanimously to recommend 
>that the HAVE specification be approved for public comment as a 
>committee draft ready for public review.
>
>Sukumar is making a couple of typographical changes, and we are 
>adding the same wording as the RM Requirements Supplement to both 
>HAVE and EDXL_RM stating that some distribution mechanism that uses 
>the same distribution types as the EDXL_DE is required. This will 
>also be reflected in the DOM to denote containment.
>
>Sukumar is going to upload the HAVE specification to the document 
>repository and we ask that the TC members review it and be ready to 
>discuss and vote on it, or be prepared to vote on opening an 
>electronic ballot for it as a Committee Draft for Public Review.
>
>NOTE:This message does not represent the minutes or meeting notes, 
>but rather an attempt to expedite the process so that we do not have 
>to wait for the TC meeting after next in order to vote on it.
>
>Regards,
>Rex
>--
>Rex Brooks
>President, CEO
>Starbourne Communications Design
>GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
>Berkeley, CA 94702
>Tel: 510-849-2309
>