[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: HAVE - suggestion to review comments during public comment period
All,
We could not discuss the comments as there were only
few people on the call - Gary, Tim and I.
I understand that people are swamped with the hundred
other things we need to do. So, I propose that we discuss the below comments
during the public comment period and I will start working on the formatting
changes.
Alternatively, if you want to meet in the next few days
- that also works for me.
Thanks
Sukumar
From: Renato Iannella [mailto:renato@nicta.com.au] Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 9:26 PM To: Emergency Mgt XML TC Subject: [emergency] HAVE comments 1 - LocationCountryName is defined as an integer - should be
string (line 261)
2 - LocationPostalCodeID is defined as an integer, but some
countries (eg UK) use non-integers.
3 - Should we reuse the OASIS CIQ spec for all the org/address/location
elements???
(since they have solved all the I18N issues)
4 - EMSOffloadMinutes has a max of 60 - will it never exceed this??
(line 283)
5 - ServiceCoverageStatus - all its subelements have one of two
string values (available/unavailable)
This could be replaced with an xsd:boolean type
instead.
6 - Surgery - all its subelements have one of two string values
(available/unavailable)
This could be replaced with an xsd:boolean type
instead.
NOTE: I assume the example (lines 1504-1514) is
not correct as the elements have no values?
7 - If there is no <Bed> element under <BedCapapcity>, then I
assume the numbers are the total for the hospital?
Otherwise, there should only be one <Bed> inside
<BedCapacity>?
8 - Is there a document that formally defines the GEO-OASIS
specification?
Cheers... Renato Iannella
National ICT Australia (NICTA)
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]