Re: [emergency] EDXL-Have major comment

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Hi Renato,

I put the question the Committee on Ontology for Health Informatics 
of the National Center for Ontological Research and the consensus was 
the red, yellow, green, black scheme, but that came with the 
disclaimer that there were, are other schemes. It would be great if 
there was a standard, so I wouldn't object to making it another 
ValueListURN. The only problem with that is that we are still not 
getting the various discrete constituencies to start publishing and 
maintaining these lists. However, that is not a good reason not to 
employ the technique, but we do need to start holding some feet to 
the fire soon.

Cheers,
Rex

At 11:44 AM +1000 1/22/07, Renato Iannella wrote:
>EDXL-HAVE has hard-wired Triage levels (red, yellow, green, black).
>
>There seems to a lot of different ways to categorise triage levels [1].
>
>Perhaps the Triage levels should be externally defined vocabularies, 
>rather than fixed elements?
>
>
>Cheers...  Renato Iannella
>National ICT Australia (NICTA)
>
>[1] <http://www.ahrq.gov/research/esi/esi2.htm>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
>privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
>use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
>recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
>messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
>data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
>amendment. This notice should not be removed.


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309