[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] HAVE comments - explicitly identifying the normative parts in the data dictionary
|
That is a very long story that needs to be
told via conference….but the short side is that they were put in as a “beta
test” a year ago and they do not belong. We have been asking
to have them removed…..those elements/attributes were not harmonized against
the NIEM core (or even against themselves) so they are worse than useless
in the terms of NIEM re-use….. Thanks, Lee 'We the unwilling, led
by the unknowing have been doing the difficult with little for so long that we
are now ready to tackle the impossible with nothing.' -- Local Fire
communications reserve volunteer motto From: Renato Iannella
[mailto:renato@nicta.com.au] On 28 Sep 2007, at 11:59, Lee Tincher wrote:
NIEM is
based on the Dublin-Core metadata descriptions (which specify normative
definitions) and it has a well defined set of Naming and Design Rules (NDR).
Why do we need to continually re-invent the wheel? NIEM 2.0 is a bit confusing! I looked at the XSD for Emergency Management [1] Domain Schema and can
see a lot of the HAVE and RM elements/attributes already in there. How did they get in there "so quick" when we have not
finished? Cheers...
Renato Iannella NICTA
[1] <http://www.niem.gov/niem-2/niem/domains/emergencyManagement/2.0/emergencyManagement.xsd> |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]