[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] RE: Sample email to interested parties WRT geo enhancements to CAP
So in GML one would have something like: <abc:Hazard gml:id="g545"> <abc:location> ... could be a GML point, polygon etc. </abc:location> <abc:alertArea> <gml:Polygon>...</gml:Polygon> </abc:alertArea> <abc:impactArea> <gml:Polygon> ... </gml:Polygon> </abc:impactArea> <abc:type>Earthquake</abc:type> </abc:Hazard> -----Original Message----- From: Renato Iannella [mailto:renato@nicta.com.au] Sent: November 21, 2007 3:22 PM To: Art Botterell Cc: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org; Carl Reed OGC Account Subject: Re: [emergency] RE: Sample email to interested parties WRT geo enhancements to CAP On 22 Nov 2007, at 03:20, Art Botterell wrote: > One of those ambiguities has to do with whether the CAP Area > element describes the area directly affected by a hazard, the > location of the hazard itself, or the area to which information > about the hazard should be routed. Don't forget...we also have CAP's big brother EDXL-DE to consider. Any changes to CAP, should be to make it also work "better" (less overlap) with EDXL-DE. Lots of thinks to think about..enjoy the turkey ;-) Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]