RE: [emergency] Re: EDXL - reference template implementation example

["David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>]

Rex,

Glad to help out here.  

Feb 22nd works well - gives me extra time to look at those other message formats.

I'm hoping people can provide us feedback on rule / content refinements as they review the examples - as what is up there so far is just my best guess - rather than actual scenario information.

Thanks, DW

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [emergency] Re: EDXL - reference template implementation
> example
> From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
> Date: Sun, February 03, 2008 8:27 am
> To: "David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>,  rexb@starbourne.com
> Cc: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> Thanks David,
> 
> This is excellent. I will be using it myself.
> 
> The next EM TC Adoption SC meeting is a week from this Friday, but 
> because a key member will be touring the Australian Emergency Reponse 
> Community, which is closely aligned with ours, I asked that we 
> postpone having you make a presentation to the EM TC Adoption SC 
> until his is back from that trip. So, Feb 22 is the date that we 
> would like to have you make your now well-worked-out presentation to 
> the Adoption SC on Friday, Feb 22, 2008.
> 
> Just for good measure, you might want to give some thought to how 
> this model will apply to EDXL-RM (Resource Messaging) which has 16 
> separate messages. My plan is to use this model for those messages.
> 
> We voted Thursday to take EDXL-RM forward to its second 60-Day Public 
> Review. I have already started work on a full implementation myself 
> targeting the local counties in the SF Bay Area, starting with Santa 
> Clara, as the county most likely to understand the benefit of 
> standardized IT. I am teaming up with David Coggeshall whose work was 
> the subject at the IRSC meeting you attended January 16. We have a 
> lot of local connections. The next target on our list will be Contra 
> Costa, which, like Arlington, VA  has a quite advanced Emergency 
> Operations Center. As far as I  know the Committee Draft version I 
> uploaded last week will be the Public Review version with name 
> changes in the title and filename.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rex
> 
> At 8:21 PM -0700 2/2/08, David RR Webber \(XML\) wrote:
> >Rex,
> >
> >I've completed the implementation reference sample.
> >
> >  http://www.drrw.net/CAM/samples/EDXL/EDXL-sample-subset.zip
> >
> >With this you can review the EDXL XML small hospital sample - then 
> >validate that with the CAM template - and then generate the EDXL 
> >Report example using the transform script.
> >
> >You can view these directly here:
> >
> >XML sample -
> >
> >  http://www.drrw.net/CAM/samples/EDXL/EDXL-sample-small-hospital.xml
> >
> >CAM template -
> >
> >  http://www.drrw.net/CAM/samples/EDXL/EDXL-subset-template.cam
> >
> >Rules documentation -
> >
> >  http://www.drrw.net/CAM/samples/EDXL/content-usage-report.html
> >
> >XSLT -
> >
> >  http://www.drrw.net/CAM/samples/EDXL/EDXL-report.xsl
> >
> >Final resulting report -
> >
> >  http://www.drrw.net/CAM/samples/EDXL/results.html
> >
> >Hope this helps people putting together their own implementation examples.
> >
> >Enjoy, DW
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rex Brooks
> President, CEO
> Starbourne Communications Design
> GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
> Berkeley, CA 94702
> Tel: 510-898-0670
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php