[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: EDXL HAVE documents for public review
Hi Elysa, There’s a few problems with the documents that need
to be resolved before the Public Review notice can go out. The main issue is
that for a 15-day review, a change-marked copy or detailed change log from the
previous Public Review Draft must be included in the package. This is because
the material up for review is limited to information that was changed since the
last public review. Minor issues to be corrected: Document Status: Public Review Draft 04 (Public Review Draft 03 was 11 October 2007; no Revision …
Revision implies unapproved document) URIs: -r02 should be removed from filenames; This version: should point to /pr04/ Previous version: should point to: http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-have/pr03/emergency_edxl_have-1.0-spec-pr03.doc
http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-have/pr03/emergency_edxl_have-1.0-spec-pr03.html
http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-have/pr03/emergency_edxl_have-1.0-spec-pr03.pdf
Status: Must conform to boilerplate. Replace first two paragraphs with
the following: This document was last revised or approved by the Emergency
Management on the above date. The level of approval is also listed above.
Check the "Latest Version" or "Latest Approved Version"
location noted above for possible later revisions of this document. For schema changes the detailed change log is the best approach. I’ll do my best to process this as quickly as I can
pending receipt of updated files. Regards, Mary From: Elysa Jones
[mailto:ejones@warningsystems.com] Dear
Mary, |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]