[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] FEMA IPAWS Note on CAP Profile
I understand the concern, Art, Since actions speak louder than words, I will let my actions speak. I wish I had a genuine preference in the issue of including Appendix B, but I don't. Unless or until someone actually asks me to do something beyond the OASIS TC Process or to support a specific action, I'll have no reason to change my position. Cheers, Rex At 8:24 AM -0800 2/20/09, Art Botterell wrote: >Can't blame you for wanting to put that on the record, Rex, but I >should point out that the issue isn't just whether you've received >explicit instructions, but whether you (or any other DHS contractor) >could reasonably be expected to act independently when DHS >representatives have expressed a strong preference, given that your >(their) own livelihood is involved. > >- Art > >>>> Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com> 02/20/09 8:17 AM >>> >Thanks for the clarification, Alessandro, > >For myself, I don't consider it a Conflict of Interest, but I can be >seen as compromised by the fact that I have accepted a subcontract >from OASIS, at least verbally, to help facilitate this work. I have >not been given instructions about how to carry out this work, nor >have I been pressured to take any positions with regard to the issues >under consideration. My current position with regard to the inclusion >of Appendix B in the candidate Committee Draft for a 60-Day Public >Review is that I have no preference strong enough to prompt me to >support including or deleting it. This doesn't happen very often, but >it is now. > >Cheers, >Rex -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-898-0670
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]