[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] EDXL HAVE and NIEM 2.1 dictionary alignment?
Uhmmm – isn’t that exactly what I just said we are doing? Thanks, Lee "I was wondering why that Frisbee was getting bigger - then
it hit me." From: David RR Webber
(XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info] Lee, IMHO - that makes zero sense! Band-aiding like that is
nasty... Obviously best outcome is to put the HAVE pieces in NIEM 2.1 Failing that - having an extended dictionary that includes the new
HAVE pieces - so we can generate two wantlists.xml automatically. One
that works with the SSGT - and one that works locally - and will include the
missing pieces as extensions.xsd into the subset schema. What we need poste haste though is the exact list of missing
parts. I have the cross-reference dictionary between EDXL HAVE and
current NIEM 2.0 - that should work as pick list of things that need to be
added. Thanks, DW
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]