RIPAWS Profile Discrepancy

["Gilmore, Timothy" <TIMOTHY.D.GILMORE@saic.com>]

All,

One of our engineers wanted me to pass along some information about
another IPAWS Profile issue:

CAP 1.2 specifies that the <info> element is optional (presumably, a
"cancel," "update," "error," or "acknowledgement" alert could use the
<references> element to specify a previous alert), and the IPAWS Profile
document doesn't say otherwise.  The IPAWS Profile *schema*, however,
makes the <info> element *required*.

Which is correct? 

Thanks,

Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC
Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP
phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012
mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: gilmoret@us.saic.com  
Please consider the environment before printing this email.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sommers, Daniel B. 
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:07 AM
To: Gilmore, Timothy
Cc: Duncans, Charlene; Gooch, Martena M.; Roe, Tom A.
Subject: IPAWS Profile Discrepancy

Tim,

Here is another IPAWS Profile issue:


Thanks,
Dan

-- 
Daniel B. Sommers | SAIC
Software Engineer | ILPSG
phone: 606.274.2079 | fax: 606.274.2025
mobile: xxx.xxx.xxxx | email: daniel.b.sommers@saic.com

Please consider the environment before printing this email.