[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: *****SPAM***** Re: [emergency] HAVE Conformance vs. Documentation vs. Released Schemas
Thanks
Not quite sure exactly what you mean by structure, but it
sounds like it will not accept anything that doesn't have elements with values
specific to these concerns. This contradicts the line that says takes any valid CAP
message.
However, I have no problem with IPAWS-OPEN doing
that at all. I also no problem with IPAWS-OPEN requiring my Canadian
Structure before accepting my CAP and forwarding.
What I need to stress is that if indeed it is only open to
these "structures" then it can't be truly said to be accepting any valid CAP message. It can
though be said to be accepting of any CAP IPAWS message
(if indeed those structures are defined in IPAWS).
Thanks
Norm From: Gary Ham [mailto:gham@grandpaham.com] Sent: March 9, 2010 3:52 PM To: Paulsen,Norm [Ontario] Cc: McGarry, Donald P.; David RR Webber (XML); emergency@lists.oasis-open.org; Dwarkanath,Sukumar - INTL Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: [emergency] HAVE Conformance vs. Documentation vs. Released Schemas R/s
Gary
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]