Re: [emergency] EDXL-DE 2.0 for the F2F - Objectivity,Subjectivity and Interpretation.

[Lee Tincher <ltincher@evotecinc.com>]

It's the second comma that gets you the format is at,long radious  
(e.g. 0,0 15000000)

Thanks,
Lee


Quoting Jacob Westfall <jake@jpw.biz>:

>> For CAP:
>> For example, consider the <circle> element.  Is the following a
>> "correct" <circle> element?
>> <circle> 0, 0, 150000000 </circle>
>
> This is invalid according to CAP.
>
>> It certainly fits the descriptions in that element's comments:  (1) it's
>> in the form "latitude, longitude, radius"; (2) the central point
>> conforms to WSG84; (3) the radius value is expressed in kilometers; and
>
> That is not what the CAP spec says, this language is coming from the  
>  EDXL-DE spec and they differ on this element, which if is   
> unintentional, needs to be corrected.
>
> --
> jake@jpw.biz
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>