RE: [emergency] Deadline Expired: Review results and next steps: gmlSF, CIQ, and Common Types profiles

["Joerg, Werner" <Werner.Joerg@iem.com>]

Title: RE: [emergency] Deadline Expired: Review results and next steps: gmlSF, CIQ, and Common Types profiles

Ok, Tim

I'll request a 7-day electronic ballot for each document separately, as soon as they are posted.

Werner



-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:tgrapes@evotecinc.com]
Sent: Tue 4/12/2011 5:10 PM
To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org; creed@opengeospatial.org
Subject: [emergency] Deadline Expired: Review results and next steps:  gmlSF, CIQ, and Common Types profiles

All,

The deadline for comments to these components expired on April 5.  Since
that date a few comments are being addressed and coordinated.  Status and
next steps were discussed on three calls today:  1- An ad-hoc cross-SC
meeting followed by 2- The EM-TC meeting, and then 3- a call with the Natl
Weather Service to discuss inputs to "weather" elements/structure.



Each component author (CIQ, gmlSF and common types) understands the final
changes and coordination required for completion.  Upon completion, each of
these three will individually posted.  At that point, the intention is
request an electronic vote for each individually. 



My question is, as each of the three documentation sets are completed and
posted ready to vote, can we have one person (Werner?) perform the actual
electronic request for vote?  Please let me know what you think.



.         Rob will plan to complete the ICS form example within one week
from today (April 19)

.         Our plan for immediate common types (and SitRep) submission is to
have "weather" in common types simply reflected  as  two string elements,
"Weather concerns" and "

o   In parallel with SitRep submission into public comment # 1, we will
determine specific weather elements and structure for incorporation into a
revision of the common types. 

o   During SitRep public comment, a comment will be submitted regarding
breaking "weather" out into distinct components

o   The goal is to have the "weather" requirement completed by the time the
SitRep public comment #1 time-frame is completed.



Please let me know if I have missed or misrepresented anything.

Thanks,
    Tim

Tim Grapes

Evotec

(703) 304-4829



From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:tgrapes@evotecinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:54 PM
To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org; creed@opengeospatial.org
Subject: [emergency] Deadline for review/comment to gmlSF, CIQ, and Common
Types profiles



All,



The purpose of this message is to request OASIS EM-TC review and comment to
the following draft specifications, and to convey the deadline for providing
your input and comments.  The DEADLINE for review and submission of comments
will be on or before COB Tuesday, April 5.  Generally, the EM-TC
subcommittees across the EM-TC have participated in this temporary
committee, and thus have participated in development and/or review of the
process and draft deliverables to date.



Please submit your comments through the specific OASIS folder were each
profile document is currently maintained below. 



This is generally an informal process within the EM-TC, which provides
re-usable components maintained within the RIM structure in support of full
EDXL standards produced and published by OASIS.  The process of making
changes forward is reasonably nimble, requiring only the EM-TC agreement for
such changes.



The latest meeting of a temporary OASIS cross-subcommittee group was held at
11:00 PM EST time today.  The purpose of this group is to focus on and
facilitate completion of commonly required components supporting the
EDXL-SitRep, DE 2.0 and HAVE 2.0.  The three supporting components now
requiring review include:



CIQ (stored in IF-SC, Requirements folder):

(spec)
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/41649
/edxl-ciq-v1.0-wd01-JW-2.odt.

(schema)
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/41657
/CIQ_Profile_Schema.zip

NOTE 1:  This still must be copied over to the formal template recently
provided to OASIS.  Please comment on the content provided.

NOTE 2:  You will notice additional data dictionary rows/annotations.  These
will not be included in the final version, and simply note attributes
currently in CIQ that will not be in included in the profile for comparison



Common Types (IF-SC, Requirements folder):

(spec)
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/41441
/edxl-ct-v1.0-wd01-JW-3.odt

(schema)
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/41442
/EDXL_Common_Types_ver04.xsd



Simple Features (GIS-SC, Specifications folder):

(spec)
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-gis/download.php/4163
0/edxl-gsf-v1.0-wd01-LEL-v0.2.odt

(schema)
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-gis/download.php/4163
1/edxl-gsf.v0.0.xsd

NOTE 1: In addition to incorporation of comments received, this profile will
then require one additional week to coordinate through our OASIS - OGC
channel (Carl Reed) to ensure accurate profiling and inclusion of any
dependent objects required for this stand-alone profile.



Sincerely,
Tim Grapes
Evotec
(703) 304-4829



From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:tgrapes@evotecinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 11:40 AM
To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [emergency] OASIS common types, CIQ and SF update



All,

We conducted our call today with the following members.  The recent postings
by Robin Covers was noted, but these are not the actual templates to be used
as expected.  Werner Joerg has the action to check with Robin on target
date.



At the moment, we are using the template that Jeff had started with in order
to move forward with the content.  Once the formal templates are received
we'll have to port over the content. 



The group reviewed the status of each of the deliverables.  Request that all
members please review available drafts and provide either comments or your
"OK".



1.       Jeff:  CIQ draft was posted for review early this morning.

2.       Jeff: Common Types draft has been published for review and was
discussed on the previous call.

3.       Lew:  Gml SimpleFeatures document and profile is targeted for draft
distribution and review by the end of this week



SitReps outstanding items:

1.       Don:  All examples are ready except "remarks" and "estimated" are
still to be added with select elements.

2.       Rob T. agreed to work development of the ICS 209 example this week.



Rob T.

Don M.

Lew L.

Tim G.

Rex B.

Tom F.

Werner J.



Thanks,
    Tim

Tim Grapes

Evotec

(703) 304-4829

"A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next
week"

- General Patton