[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] CAP in Taiwan
Elysa -
I think there is a slight misunderstanding. The Taiwan disaster community
is not misusing CAP in a legal sense. They have extended CAP as required to use
national CRS. I am suspecting they used the appropriate extension mechanism.
They are quite good at correctly following international standards. They
implement OGC/ISO standards quite well and follow them very closely. We did not
have time to “dig” into the actual profile. I was there for other business and
this topic just happened to be part of a presentation.
Some are thinking of using CAP for non-alerting/notification messaging.
While this may be fine, these few folks are thinking of CAP as a more general
messaging encoding for more complex applications for which something like NIEM
is more appropriate.
I did not mean to stir the pot!
Cheers
Carl From: Elysa Jones
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:35 AM
Cc: 'Dee Schur'
Subject: RE: [emergency] CAP in Taiwan Hi
Carl, Thank
you for your notice on this. I hope they will join our Committee for
guidance and insight. I am copying Dee Schur so she will reach out to
them. I also replied to Art’s message and copied OASIS Legal for
direction regarding certain uses/mis-uses of the Standard.
However,
on the comment you make in your last statement, I do not agree. CAP is a
very capable Standard for everything from Sensor alerts to notifications.
It is being used for messaging applications beyond alerting with tremendous
success. Cheers, Elysa
Jones, Chair OASIS Emergency
Management Technical Committee Emergency
Interoperability Member Section From:
emergency@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:emergency@lists.oasis-open.org] On
Behalf Of Carl Reed Dear TC
- Last week I had the opportunity to
visit the Taiwan National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction
(NCDR). They provided a presentation on 2015 development plans. They are looking
to integrate the use of CAP into their alerting infrastructure. They have
developed a Taiwan profile for CAP – partly driven by the need to support
additional coordinate reference systems (CRS) beyond WGS 84. I suggested that
they join the OASIS discussion on the current CAP revision requirements and
thoughts. Some in the Government also want to use CAP for messaging applications
beyond alerting. I suggested that would probably not be a good idea given the
original requirements and use cases for CAP. Cheers Carl Reed, PhD |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]