[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ENERGYINTEROP-299) Need betterconsistency in the notion of an ID versus a name (line 892)

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=24524#action_24524 ] 

Edward Cazalet  commented on ENERGYINTEROP-299:
-----------------------------------------------

This general approach sounds good to me.  What is the proposal for EI?

> Need better consistency in the notion of an ID versus a name (line 892)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-299
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-299
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ed Koch 
>            Assignee: William Cox
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Within the EiEvent class, the EiConstaint class, and the EiOptout class there are names and ID attributes. The presumption is that an ID is some sort of object reference and a name is some sort of human readable representation. In some cases such as EiProgram:programID and EiProgram:programName we use both.  It is unclear where a name versus an ID is required and perhaps in some cases where both should be there.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira