[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [energyinterop] Proposal for replacement for EI Fig. 1-1
Good question. Is not Energy Interop serving the ideal of more efficient markets and use of resources? So, the “Resouce Provider” can be the customer, or the generator, or the storage—but then maybe they are also just a service provider to the utility? That is, OpenADR is not serving a customer, but rather the “customer” is providing DR service to the utility. Maybe EI is only about VEN and VTNs? And the market operator is a “market service provider”? If by customer we mean the end load buildings that consume most of the power and the industrial plants that eat the rest, then they are the only ones who are not a service provider, just a consumer (although they can act in other roles). So, maybe we need a cloud just for “consumer”? I was trying to show that the consumer can also be DER. Maybe this? From: Ed Cazalet [mailto:ed@cazalet.com] Sorry, but where is the customer in the new diagram? Are they not who Energy Interop is to serve? Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D. 101 First Street, Suite 552 Los Altos, CA 94022 650-949-5274 cell: 408-621-2772 From: Holmberg, David [mailto:david.holmberg@nist.gov] This addresses Jira issue 306. The current Fig 1-1: My proposed update for discussion: I’m trying to get down to the fundamental view of who is using EI, and away from the NIST cloud diagram. Does this work? Or is it getting closer? David Holmberg NIST Engineering Laboratory 301-975-6450 “God cannot give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it is not there. There is no such thing.” |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]