[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Registration and Party IDs
Primarily for Gerry and Bruce: A primary purpose of Registration is to receive a Party ID for interacting with the market. During enrollment, one can associate that Party ID with one or more metrology points, which may happen to be specific revenue meters. 1) In emerging markets closely allied with existing markets, should the Party ID by an MRID? 2) If a truck drives into my meter, and I get a physically new meter (with a new faceplate, etc.) does this change my MRID in today’s infrastructure? 3) If I register multiple Resources, is there a pre-existing definition of MRID as it relates to the submetering meter ids? In a closely related question, Say I switch out the software and hardware that operates my ESI. I then re-register and rejoin the market contexts. In some market contexts, there may be non-trivial “establishment” costs. These might include posting a bond, establishing a line of credit, etc. I may get different value for my response based upon a reputation that my [Party ID] has established for fast, accurate performance. It would be useful to join my new registration ID to the pre-existing identity in some way. This is the ill-defined Account. Any thoughts? tc “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]