[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Proposed URI classes
At 14:45 2000 11 20 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: >A new thread... ...with a bad subject line. These are not URI classes. Public identifiers include strings that are not valid URIs. Besides, we are not in the business of classifying URIs. We are identifying useful XML contexts for external identifiers. >So far, I recall seeing the following classes. Is this a complete set? > >public >system >namespace >stylesheet >include > >The only others that come to mind are "import" but I think we can call >that a type of include and "xlink" (i.e. resource URIs) but that makes >me a little uneasy. Anything that does not have a defined function and context in XML 1.0+namespaces (think the Infoset) makes me uneasy for xmlcat version 1.0, and that includes include. (I consider the stylesheet PI to be of the same generation as XML 1.0+namespaces, but XInclude isn't even a CR yet, and other forms of include require application dependent knowledge even to recognize them.) paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC