[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: first proposal
Lauren Wood wrote: > > Yep. I don't mind long names as long as they're clear. But I'm not > > delighted with LoadCatalog, since it's the only one that's got a verb > > in it. > [...] > > > > Maybe just 'import'. (The semantics of the CATALOG directive are more > > like xsl:import than xsl:include.) > > > > Yes, I think I vote for 'import' all by itself. > > Works for me. Umm. Isn't it the case that the referenced catalog is not searched unless the current catalog does not satisfy the request? This seems to me like subclassing (the current catalog is a subcatalog of the referenced catalog), the Java term for which is "extend". That's what I had in mind. How about "subCatalogOf"? -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC