[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: first proposal
Hi Tony, Norm, Lauren and all; My vote goes with "camelCase" or "CamelCase", and my reason is the same as Lauren's. Regards, David Leland Lauren Wood <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca> on 12/03/2000 05:27:32 PM To: entity-resolution@lists.oasis-open.org cc: (bcc: David Leland/LONDON/FINANCIAL TIMES) Subject: Re: first proposal On 3 Dec 2000, Tony Coates wrote: > > > On 29/11/2000 14:11:23 Norman Walsh wrote: > > >Matter of taste, I guess. That means we have four choices: > > > >1. All UPPERCASE, as per 9401 > >2. All lowercase > >3. camelCase like XML Schema, Java identifiers, etc. > >4. CamelCase like the SGML DocBook DTD (though only because case > > didn't matter) > > Sorry to do this, but I would like to suggest #5: > > 5. UpperCamelCase for elements, lowerCamelCase for attributes. > > Privately, the touch-typist in me prefers lower-case-with-hyphens Which would be proposal number 6? If we're figuring out which of 1- 5, why not 1-6? The main reason I don't like all lower, or all upper, is that the words run together. Almost anything that solves that problem gets my vote. Lauren ********************************************************************* * Please visit the web site of the Financial Times at: * * http://www.ft.com * * * * For UK personal finance, please visit http://www.ftyourmoney.com * * * * This E-Mail is intended for the use of the addressee only and may * * contain confidential information. If you are not the intended * * recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination * * of this communication is strictly prohibited. * * If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us * * immediately then delete this E-Mail. * * * * * postmaster@ft.com * *********************************************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC