RE: locating schemas via public ids

[Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>]

David,

I don't understand what you're saying at all.

paul

At 16:02 2001 01 24 +0000, Leland David wrote:
>>Norm Walsh wrote on Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:16 PM
>>I think there needs to be some way to distinguish public
>>identifiers from system identifiers in the schema hints list.
>
>I agree with this suggestion.  However, does that mean something other than
>the way that SYSTEM and PUBLIC identifiers are mentioned in
>"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml"?
>
>'An example of an XML document with a document type declaration:
>
><?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE greeting SYSTEM "hello.dtd">
><greeting>Hello, world!</greeting> 
> 
>
>The system identifier "hello.dtd" gives the address (a URI reference) of a
>DTD for the document.'
>
>If the portions [lines 52 -56 ?] of TR9401 that read (as follows below) are
>written as a positive requirement, then it appears that, if we follow
>TR9401, we will have our hint?
>
>'Valid FSIs include unpathed, relative, and absolute file names and URLs as
>well as FSIs with explicit storage managers (as defined in the SGML General
>Facilities). Most of the examples in this resolution will show s.o.i.s, but
>this resolution allows FSIs as the right hand side of most catalog entries.
>For example, the following are possible catalog entries that associate a
>public identifier with an s.o.i.:
>
>PUBLIC "ISO 8879-1986//ENTITIES Added Latin 1//EN" "iso-lat1.gml"
>PUBLIC "-//USA/AAP//DTD BK-1//EN" "aapbook.dtd"
>PUBLIC "-//ACME//DTD Report//EN" "http://acme.com/dtds/report.dtd"'
>
>Regards,
>David Leland