[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: minutes from ER teleconference 20010219
John Cowan wrote: > What I thought I was supposed to do, and what I have done[1], was to request > the TREX TC to assign an FPI for the "TREX Pattern for TREX", which is > analogous to the XML Schema for XML Schemas. There is no DTD for TREX > as such. > > The FPI I have proposed is: > > -//OASIS::TC::TREX//TEXT TREX Pattern for TREX//EN//1.0 > > TEXT is the appropriate document class for TREX patterns, since they > are document instances. > > That done, we can add the result to our "Informal list of well-known > public identifiers." Of course, other people who create TREX > patterns are then free to assign FPIs to them. > > This is quite separate from my proposal to use an "urn:publicid:" URI > as the TREX namespace name. > > TREX does not define any way for a document to refer to a TREX pattern > that can be used to validate it, so there is no issue similar to > the xsi:schemaLocation issue. > > I hope this clears everything up. > > == > > [1]http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/trex/200102/msg00032.html This is indeed the sort of thing I intended; thanks for the proposal. It looks fine to me as a recommendation for a TREX schema FPI. Lauren
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC