entity-resolution message

Subject: Re: What John thinks: public id to URN mapping

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 12:14:51 -0400

Paul Grosso wrote:


> I agree with all the simplification including not bothering to
> make the leading + a special case.

Looks like we have consensus, then.  + is always magic.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What John thinks: public id to URN mapping
  - From: Lauren Wood <lauren@softquad.com>

References:
- What John thinks: public id to URN mapping
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Re: What John thinks: public id to URN mapping
  - From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>